You're in a courtroom and you're watching your future hang on by a thread. You then have a decision handed down and you feel that the decision is fundamentally unfair.
Questions, doubts, and lingering thoughts flood your mind and all that you keep asking yourself is, “Was justice truly served in my case?” When you opt for appeals, the principal influence on the appeals process is Michigan case law, which sets the pace for today's justice via previous rulings.
If you're looking for closure and clarity, or fighting for freedom, you need a good grasp of case law as it could be the key to turning the tide in your favor.
What is Michigan Case Law?
Case law is a collection of legal principles that have been formed through judicial decisions as opposed to written laws that have been created and passed by legislative bodies like Congress or a state legislature. The decisions include past rulings from two main places, the Michigan Supreme Court and the Michigan.
Court of Appeals.
Michigan case law comes from two main courts:
Michigan Supreme Court – Highest authority; rulings set binding precedents. Its rulings often shed light on the ambiguities that come with interpreting statutes or the Constitution.
The Michigan Court of Appeals – is the intermediate appellate court that is responsible for interpreting laws and resolving legal conflicts. It handles most cases from the lower courts and establishes rules for future similar cases.
Michigan's courts act in line with the principle of stare decisis, which is a Latin phrase that means “to stand by things decided.” This principle works with past rulings when deciding similar cases unless there is a justifiable cause to make alterations.
The stare decisis philosophy promotes stability all the while providing the flexibility for the law to evolve with societal changes. When you're addressing unclear statutes, contesting a civil ruling, or appealing a criminal conviction, knowing which relevant case law to work with can determine the success or failure of your case.
The Anatomy of Michigan Case Law
Michigan case law's structure is made up of two main types of authority, binding authority and persuasive authority. Binding authority refers to the decisions made by the Michigan Supreme Court that all lower courts in the state of Michigan must follow. This authority is what contributes to the consistency and stability that exists in the legal system.
An example of binding authority is when the Michigan Supreme Court gives a ruling on a criminal law case. The ruling will set a precedent that all lower courts must follow unless a higher court like the U.S. intervenes.
Persuasive authority refers to those rulings that are not mandatory but still have a substantial impact. These rulings can come from other state courts or federal courts. Michigan courts are not expected to follow them but they may decide to if the reasoning is sound. They may also adopt the rules if there is no clear ruling on the same issue in Michigan's own legal history.
A good example of persuasive authority is when Michigan courts have not given a ruling on a specific legal question. What will happen is that the judge responsible will draw inspiration from how other courts in other states or federal courts dealt with similar issues and use it as a guiding light on the ruling they give.
The reasoning behind the persuasive authority’s approach is that the logic and reasoning of the judges from other courts reflect well-established legal principles or offer a well-reasoned analysis that can help address the issue at hand. The practical understanding of the difference between binding and persuasive authority is useful when it comes to determining the weight of past rulings during appeals.
How Michigan Case Law Drives the Success of Your Appeals
Case law serves as the pillar of appellate advocacy. And appeals attorneys draw upon established precedents to demonstrate to the judges listening to your case that there were legal errors in the trial court’s decision. And for that reason, your case warrants a reversal or modification.
One of the things appeals advocates look out for is if a trial court misinstructed the jury, which may potentially skew their verdict. And case law determines the criteria for what qualifies as clear and accurate instructions.
Also, Michigan courts have made many decisions in the past about what evidence can or cannot be used in a trial (admissibility of evidence). For instance, they look at where crucial testimony wasn't included and where unfair material was considered. And the past decisions, or case law, guide the judges and lawyers in determining how to handle similar situations in the future.
Moreover, when it comes to constitutional violations, appeals base their arguments on state or federal constitutional rights like the right to a fair trial or due process. And landmark Michigan rulings influence how these rights are protected in practice.
Appellate attorneys carefully examine MI Supreme Court cases in trial court proceedings to reveal errors. And they do it in three ways, which are case analysis, brief writing, and oral advocacy. In case analysis, lawyers compare lower court decisions with relevant case law to point out inconsistencies.
With brief writing, the advocates cite authoritative Michigan opinions to fortify legal arguments. And they leverage oral advocacy to present strong arguments that align with prevailing case law interpretations.
How Mark Linton Champions Your Justice with Michigan Case Law
To understand Michigan case law, you need to go beyond just reading opinions. You should also have a thorough comprehension of judicial philosophy, procedural complexities, and strategic advocacy. And well-reputed attorneys like Mark Linton combine extensive knowledge of Michigan case law with practical expertise to empower you to pursue justice with confidence.
Mark understands that a single decision rarely tells the full story. So, he focuses on patterns in case law to reveal how the judiciary’s philosophy evolves over time. He also stays ahead of potential legislative or judicial changes to ensure your legal arguments remain robust. You need an experienced lawyer by your side when performing a Michigan Supreme Court case search or pursuing an appeal if you want a smooth and rewarding experience.
Contact Mark Linton today to learn how Mark uses Michigan case law to your advantage to fight for your justice.
Comments