top of page

Unlocking Success: How to Win a 6500 Motion in Michigan

Writer: Mark LintonMark Linton

attorney securing 6500 motion with client

Cracking the Code to a Winning 6500 Motion in Michigan


If you've gone through all your direct appeals options in Michigan, but you feel like the conviction still haunts you, you may feel restless, burdened by unresolved questions, and driven to explore every last avenue for vindication. And a 6500 Motion provides a way to satisfy that unshakable urge to seek justice. However, securing relief under Michigan Court Rule (MCR) 6.500 is notoriously difficult, and you need a precise and strategic approach to succeed. 


This article covers the nuances of 6500 Motions and the critical elements that differentiate a strong, rewarding petition from a weak one.


Understanding 6500 Motions and Their Stakes Properly


A 6500 Motion (also commonly referred to as a Motion for Relief From Judgment) is a legal recourse after conviction that makes it possible for defendants to challenge the verdict given. People take this path when all standard appeals have failed. And while direct appeals focus on the flaws recorded at trial, 6500 Motions allow you to seek your case's reconsideration in various ways. 


Firstly, you get to present newly discovered evidence that was unavailable during trial and demonstrate that the evidence has the power to overturn the verdict. Secondly, you can point out a constitutional violation that you feel greatly affected the trial's outcome. Thirdly, you can cite ineffective assistance that was not previously addressed in earlier appeals due to an external issue. And finally, you can prove a jurisdictional defect in the original proceedings that led to your case's ruling.


Moreover, courts work with a “good cause” and “actual prejudice” standard which expects you to explain why the issue you're raising now wasn't brought up earlier and the extent to which it affected the case result. 6500 Motions are not easy to grant and mere dissatisfaction with your sentence isn't enough to get your case heard.


What Makes 6500 Motions an Uphill Battle?


On the surface level, weak arguments and procedural missteps appear to contribute to an unsatisfactory outcome. However, upon a closer look, you'll uncover deeper structural obstacles that undermine even well-prepared motions. These challenges include:


Judicial reluctance - Michigan courts work with the principle of finality. This means that judges are often reluctant to register cases unless the case is backed by convincing evidence. And even with well-founded claims, you should still expect resistance and hesitation to disrupt settled cases.


Limited legal precedents favoring defendants - In 6500 Motions, Michigan's legal landscape is not particularly friendly to defendants. Unlike some states with more favorable post-conviction relief doctrines, Michigan courts require you to comply with very high evidentiary and procedural standards. 


Burden of new evidence - Freshly uncovered evidence is one of the strongest grounds for a 6500 Motion. However, courts will strictly scrutinize such claims to determine if your case deserves reconsideration. The evidence must be material, credible, and likely to affect the judgment. Additionally, you must demonstrate that the evidence couldn’t have been obtained at trial through due diligence.


Harsh “good cause” standards - Michigan courts have set a high bar when it comes to proving why you, the petitioner, didn't bring up the issue earlier. Even if you raise the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel, the court can dismiss your case if it concludes that you should’ve raised it in prior appeals.


The Tactical Approach to Winning a 6500 Motion


To navigate the process swiftly, you need to ensure that your 6500 Motion is meticulously crafted and that it anticipates and neutralizes counterarguments before they arise. Here's how you do that.


Leveraging Scientific and Forensic Advances


In cases relying on forensic evidence like DNA, toxicology, and ballistics, think about how modern advancements might discredit old findings. If you're able to prove that past forensic methods were flawed, through scientific developments, the courts are more likely to reconsider the validity of the original evidence which can potentially lead to a reduced sentence, an overturned conviction or a new trial.


For instance, if you're convicted based on bite mark analysis, you can demonstrate how experts deem that practice unreliable through new scientific developments.


Strategic Use of Brady Violations and Prosecutorial Misconduct


If the prosecution fails to disclose exculpatory evidence (known as a Brady violation), your odds of being granted relief are high. However, the biggest problem here is in proving suppression. Experienced appeals attorneys often use FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests and post-conviction discovery motions to expose withheld documents. For example, you can prove that key eyewitness statements weren't disclosed.


Post-conviction Social Media and Digital Evidence


Since courts have started acknowledging digital footprints as credible new evidence, you can use social media and digital evidence for exoneration. Social Media posts, GPS tracking, and cellphone metadata can offer alibi evidence that wasn't available at the time of trial. For instance, in a criminal law case, you can use newly discovered location data to prove you were miles away from the crime scene.


Case Studies: When 6.500 Motions Lead to Freedom


To fully comprehend the power of an expertly executed 6500 Motion, let's look at real-life cases that Mark Linton, one of the best Michigan appellate attorneys, crafted, which led to success:



Order granting motion for relief from judgment of conviction


judgment of conviction document

The McPhilimy Case: McPhilimy, received a criminal sexual conduct conviction in which he had been sentenced to a lifetime electronic GPS tether and sex offender registry. He filed a 6500 Motion, which was granted. This decision changed his life.



order granting motion to quash

Order grant permission to quash

The Hicks Case: Hicks was charged with first-degree arson and was facing a potential life sentence. Mark Linton successfully got his case dismissed through a 6500 Motion.



court of appeals order


The Vick Case: Vick was facing a murder conviction and the Michigan Supreme Court granted the 6500 Motion, thanks to Mark Linton's meticulous approach.


Why You Need Mark Linton to Fight for a Second Chance


A Michigan 6500 Motion is more about fighting for your freedom than just another legal filing. It's about reclaiming your future and your truth. And the motion is your strongest remaining chance to clear your name. However, the path of justice is filled with legal traps and procedural hurdles that can easily derail your case, prolong your suffering, and keep you trapped in a wrongful conviction.


Winning requires deep legal knowledge, innovative arguments, relentless determination, and strategic presentation of evidence. And if you're fully committed to reversing your conviction, you can't afford to gamble on this process. You should partner with a skilled attorney Like Mark Linton who knows how to craft a motion that demands the court's attention.

 

If you believe that your case qualifies for a 6500 Motion, don't wait. Contact Mark Linton today for a case evaluation and take the first step toward reclaiming your life.


Comments


bottom of page