Insights from Michigan Appeals
Attorney Mark Linton:
Expert Guidance on Criminal Appeals

Michigan courts strictly distinguish between cumulative evidence and materially new evidence when deciding motions for a new trial. This article explains how judges apply that distinction, why cumulative evidence is often rejected, and what makes new evidence capable of changing an outcome.

Cumulative evidence is one of the most common reasons Michigan courts deny motions for a new trial. This article explains how the rule works, why judges rely on it, and what newly discovered evidence must show to overcome this barrier.

In Michigan post-conviction litigation, there are many common mistakes people make. However, very few are as fatal as confusing newly discovered evidence with newly available evidence. On paper, this difference may seem academic. But in Michigan courtrooms, it can determine whether a motion is seriously considered or dismissed outright. Judges don't treat all new evidence the same. Michigan courts apply a strict, multi-factor test to newly discovered evidence claims. Understa

A Motion for a New Trial in Michigan can reopen the door to justice when something went wrong at trial. Learn how this powerful legal tool works, when it should be filed, and how it can protect your loved one’s future.